For over a year the Lake Union Opportunity Alliance has been fighting proposals from the city to raise allowable building heights to 300 feet between Denny Way and the South Lake Union waterfront. Currently the height limits are 125 feet along Denny and 40 feet at the waterfront. If these heights were to be raised, many say it would significantly alter the live-ability of the still young South Lake Union neighborhood and block lake views for those living on the facing hillsides in Queen Anne and Capitol Hill.
Anyone invested in the future of South Lake Union, or the views of the lake from Queen Anne, is encouraged to attend a public meeting on Tuesday, January 26 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at Seattle Unity Church Fellowship Hall, located at 200 8th Ave N, to review and comment on the revised Environmental Impact Study alternatives and voice their opinions on the development of South Lake Union.
At the meeting the city will present the draft design framework for the development of South Lake Union for the public to comment on (download PDF copy here). The Department of Planning and Development will also discuss the revised height and density Environmental Impact Study reports (download PDF copy here), and will answer any questions the public may have about the study and rezoning process.
LUOA, which represents 500 South Lake Union residents, believes that all three EIS alternatives provide excessively high building heights that would hinder the neighborhood’s growth, arguing that the first alternative, which allows for 300 foot towers along the waterfront of South Lake Union, would ruin the pedestrian experience in the area in addition to blocking views in nearby neighborhoods. LUOA says that views of the Space Needle would be blocked for many living in South Lake Union, while views of the lake would be blocked for many living on the east and south slopes of Queen Anne. The Capitol Hill Times reported last week that higher towers on South Lake Union would significantly block views from the west side of Capitol Hill.
According to LUOA board member Diane Masson, many living in Queen Anne who would be affected by the zoning changes have not even heard about the issue yet. Which is why, she says, it is so important for Queen Anne and South Lake Union residents to attend Tuesday’s meeting, voice their opinions, and send an email or letter to Mayor Mike McGinn.
LUOA is working to ensure that the final rezoning recommendation include the following:
- Responsible, measured density growth that preserves the character of the neighborhood, provides for housing, income diversity and local businesses.
- Step down in height across the South Lake Union basin from 240 ft at Denny Way to 40 ft at the Lake to preserve views of the Space Needle and Lake for all.
- No increase in current height allowed for commercial buildings.
- Tower spacing above 85 ft no less than 150 ft.
- Limit podium heights to 20-40 ft.
- Complete the Concurrency Plan for public amenities before rezone is approved, including community center, branch library, public school location, transportation and parking.
- Provided for parks and open space to meet the Seattle Comprehensive plan of 1 acre of parks or open space per 1000 residents.
- Maintain current zoning in all of the Cascade Neighborhood, including to Fairview Avenue.
- Protect View Corridors toward Lake Union on Westlake, Terry and Fairview Avenues.
Although the meeting tomorrow will cover the EIS alternatives, the issue of development in South Lake Union is two-fold: Two weeks ago, the city approved a Land Use Amendment that allows building heights of up to 120 feet, plus an additional 15 feet of rooftop mechanical equipment, in the area zoned for Phase III of the UW Medical Campus. (Read what Councilmember Tim Burgess, who voted for the Amendment, has to say here. Read LUOA’s opinion here.)
To read up on the plans for South Lake Union click here, or contact Jim Holmes at jim.holmes@seattle.gov or (206) 684-8372.
Tweet

19 responses so far ↓
1 Name // Jan 26, 2010 at 6:50 am
I am more concerned that people have jobs rather than views. It has been ruled time and time again that people are not guaranteed to the views that they may currently have from their homes. Last I checked, a job buys food and housing. A view doesn't.
Increasing building heights makes it economical to open the buildings that provide these jobs.
And I see nothing wrong with encouraging more doctors, scientists and research professionals in the neighborhood, as will be the case with UW Phase III.
2 prbguy // Jan 26, 2010 at 7:16 am
I'm not just concerned about views. What about sunlight? By putting the tallest buildings to the south, you'll create long shadows north to the lake. Each successive block north will be in the shadow of taller buildings to the south. Who will want to live and work in canyons of perpetual twilight. (Oh, right…vampires!)
3 QAHill // Jan 26, 2010 at 9:04 am
Why are we building more space when there is more than enough avaliable that isn't rented? This is really stupid.
4 MM // Jan 26, 2010 at 9:46 am
I support limiting the height of the buildings and preserving the views to keep the character and beauty of these neighborhoods intact. Once the tall buildings are in place, it's likely they'll have a permanent, negative impact that will be irreversible. Let's plan for the future instead of thinking short-term.
5 joshuadf // Jan 26, 2010 at 12:02 pm
I'm sorry, but this is very poor reporting. First of all, the meeting tonight is supposed to be about the SLU Urban Design Framework, not EIS alternatives:
http://www.seattle.gov/DPD/Planning/South_Lake_...
Many people have put a lot of work into the UDF. Please come if you are interested in providing positive comments about what you like (e.g., green street design), but please don't hijack the meeting to complain about a different issue.
That said, here is some info on the revised EIS alternatives (also available on the Seattle.gov website), which based on public comments including my own now require podiums and one tower per block by the lake. Please think carefully when someone claims that views of a large lake will be “blocked” by a few potential buildings spaced out over several blocks.
Also note that LUOA is advocating 240 ft instead of 300 ft, and south of Denny (closer to downtown) is already zoned even higher–search for the stalled 1200 Stewart or 6th and Lenora projects for example.
Lastly, it's “UW Medicine” not “UW Medical”.
Thanks, from a SLU resident.
6 Kevin // Jan 26, 2010 at 12:20 pm
Actually, Joshua, tonight is about the UDF and the city is formally unveiling the revised EIS alternatives.
From:
http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/cms/groups/pan/@pan/...
“DPD staff will also present revised height and density
environmental impact study alternatives and answer questions about the
study and rezone process.”
I think this is a great article, thanks!
7 Barney Stinson // Jan 26, 2010 at 12:53 pm
So views of a breathtaking city skyline aren't desired? What planet are you living on?
8 Barney Stinson // Jan 26, 2010 at 12:54 pm
The sun rises in the north and sets in the south?
9 joshuadf // Jan 26, 2010 at 1:26 pm
Ah, my misake then. I do hope some discussion and comments can be about the UDF though.
10 prbguy // Jan 26, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Um, actually, no…that's not what I said. Since you may have snored your way through science classes as a kid, here's a refresher: Because we're in the northern lattitudes here in Seattle, the sun tends to hug the southern horizon, especially in the late fall, winter, and early spring. Sunlight will hit the southern side of buildings. Pay attention now…Since sunlight can't pass through buildings, objects on the north side of the building will be in shadow. Taller buildings will cast longer shadows. Hope this helps.
11 Barney Stinson // Jan 27, 2010 at 11:04 am
If you want to live in a land dominated by one story buildings move to Palm Springs. Here in big cities we have tall buildings. Quit your crying.
12 Barney Stinson // Jan 27, 2010 at 7:04 pm
If you want to live in a land dominated by one story buildings move to Palm Springs. Here in big cities we have tall buildings. Quit your crying.
13 snicelisleshY // Jul 1, 2010 at 12:22 pm
viagra time sensitive
phisher viagra
viagra on prescription in the uk
cheap online purchase viagra
when will viagra become generic
palm tree pollen viagra
lowest viagra prices
a useing viagra
viagra sildenafil
directions and use for viagra
importation viagra
active ingredient is sildenafil citrate
zenegra sildenafil wrigley
texas bow hunting viagra
viagra side effects itching
sex slave viagra use
viagra cialis compare
viagra awp
katelaris p viagra australia
email virus viagra repair
fake viagra at starship shops
where to but viagra safe
ibuprofen viagra interaction
male depression ssri viagra libido
viagra s
nouvelles faux viagra
viagra norvasc
14 StellaDennis31 // Jul 6, 2010 at 11:46 am
I had a dream to make my firm, however I didn’t earn enough of money to do this. Thank goodness my fellow told to utilize the mortgage loans. Hence I used the college loan and realized my desire.
15 Tramadol // Jul 15, 2010 at 1:02 pm
Buy Tramadol Online Buy tramadol Online Buy Tramadol Online
16 tooniesse // Jul 21, 2010 at 6:24 am
primary sources for viagra insurance
4 viagra
2004 viagra nascar car
viagra india mail order
viagra how young is too young
viagra subs
drug precautions for viagra
viagra at boots
zenega viagra
viagra chewable tablets
book buy online order viagra
paxil viagra
uk alternative viagra
what is viagra triangle chicago
100 sildenafil citrate
viagra in cation
what makes viagra work
find search viagra edinburgh soft
viagra online australia
phizer viagra
lowest dosage of viagra
viagra viagra buy
vigorex or viagra
buying sildenafil ctrate on line
girls take viagra edinburgh pages boring
17 mixing coke and viagra // Jul 23, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Hello, thanx for your does generic viagra work Great
18 online viagra prescription canada // Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Hello, thanx for your viagra availability at boots Great
19 tooniesse // Jul 31, 2010 at 7:46 pm
generic viagra caverta caverta pillshoprxcom
australia viagra cialis purchase
cheapest prices on generic viagra
subaction showcomments viagra smile older
herbal viagra replacements
site viagra viagra
buy online viagra securely buy phentermine
male sexual performance with viagra
sildenafil citrate gel
safe alternative to viagra
viagra audio