A news blog for Seattle's Queen Anne neighborhood

 

SHARE protesters will sleep outside Councilmember Burgess’ home for a third night

October 1st, 2009 · Comments

Tonight homeless men and women from SHARE will sleep outside of City Councilman Tim Burgess’ home for the third night in a row. The group announced their plans in a press release today, saying that they will continue their protest until their “transportation crisis is over,” and dispute the claim made by many in the Seattle community that their actions are merely a “publicity stunt.” SHARE wrote,

Last night, there was a police presence at the sleepout not because of our actions (as usual our protest was quiet and peaceful) but to appease the unsubstantiated paranoia of one of Mr. Burgess’ neighbors. It is unfortunate that with the current recession and budget cuts, the City can still afford to dispatch its public servants to serve as personal body guards.

We will continue our protest until our transportation crisis is over. This is NOT a publicity stunt, but a sad truth. The bus drivers union realizes it too and has invited us to come and meet with them tonight at 8 PM at the Labor Temple to see how we could work together.

There are some in the over-privileged strata of society who naively see our actions as a theatrical extortion tactic, which shows how disconnected some people are from the harsh realities of life. Too many Americans are one paycheck away from homelessness. Without transportation, we cannot access our safe place to stay at night. We choose instead to sleep out and protest at the houses of those (the politicians) responsible for our predicament.

Unsheltered people die outside. Already this year, WHEEL/Church of Mary Magdalene Women in Black have stood for 29 homeless people who died outside or by violence. This morning we just heard of three more deaths which occurred recently, including the death by immolation of a homeless woman in Woodland Park. Next Wednesday at noon our sisters will have to stand for them too.

SHARE members have been sleeping outside houses in protest since Monday night, when Tent City 4 residents camped outside Mayor Nickels’ home. On Tuesday protesters from Tent City 3 moved Burgess’ home on Upper Queen Anne.

Councilmember Burgess shared his experience talking with the campers on Tuesday night and speaking with four of them further during his morning power walk on Wednesday on his personal blog.

We’re still waiting on a comment from a SHARE representative as to why they’ve chosen to continue their protest at this location rather than move on to the home of another politician. Meanwhile, readers have delved into conversation via comment on yesterday’s update. Many have expressed distrust in SHARE’s management, while others say this is an issue not about one organization, but about homelessness in a larger sense. Michaelkelly wrote,

In the end, SHARE/WHEEL is not the issue here. The issue is that we don’t have enough affordable housing in Seattle to meet the (growing) need. The 2009 One Night Count found 1977 people living unsheltered on the streets of Seattle. That’s a 2% increase from the year before. This is in addition to the thousands of people staying in shelters and transitional housing on any given night.

We need to provide more housing that the most vulnerable and lowest income families and individuals in Seattle can afford. VOTING YES on Prop 1, the Seattle Housing Levy, will help us to do this. The bulk of the Housing Levy will help to provide or preserve thousands of units for people earning less than 30% of the area median income ($25,300 for a family of four). It will keep people in safe, decent, and affordable housing and off of the streets.

Proposition 1 proposes a seven-year tax increase for low-income housing. For more information, see Yes for Homes, and this no on Prop 1 editorial from the Seattle Times.

What do you think? Comment or email us at tips@queenanneview.com.

Tags: Uncategorized

  • careabouteveryone
    Outdated link to Seattle Times, they haven't taken a position yet on the 2009 Proposition 1, Seattle Housing Levy renewal.
  • Name
    Yes, SHARE is requiring the homeless they proclaim to serve to attend the protest. One member even reported in the comments section of a related article on the Seattle Times online that SHARE was closing their indoor shelters and shifting people over from both Tent City 3 and Tent City 4 in order to have people at Nickelsville and Burgess house.
  • Name
    not REQUIRING, but definitely making it harder on them by making them hike from downtown to their respective churches....completely ridiculous.

    anyone know what their plans are for tonight? prolly still sleeping out in front of TB's place.
  • SorryButNo
    There are reports that SHARE is requiring its homeless members to participate in these sleepout protests, as a condition for having access to shelter space. I wonder if some city official can look into whether this is true?

    It is precisely this sort of tactic (which is not new, from what I understand), which made me withdraw my support of this specific group some time ago.
  • flk
    yes this is true they told me if i didn't go to these protest that i would loose my shelter space that sucks becuase i go for major back surgery next week and i really need a place to stay and rest
  • jonfredric
    haha! this is awesome, anyone know his addie on Bigelow?
  • Name
    SHARE must feel like Burgess house is a good visible location to stir up media attention, so that is why they are remaining there. It's all about the publicity fr them.

    On another front, tonight members of Our Redeemers church in Ballard will be hosting a meeting of their "task force" to discuss what they will do about the fact that SHARE was harboring a Level 3 sex offender/child rapist at their men's shelter that is currently in a vacant church building known as Calvary. You see, SHARE refused to run sex offender checks at that location (probably because they knew they harbored sex offenders) and an alert neighbor was notified by the King County sex offender registry that a guy who had been released from jail after yet another violation of his parole had been living at the SHARE shelter for weeks. It was only when this concerned neighbor made this public that SHARE removed the rapist. You can read all about it in the "my ballard" forum here:
    http://www.myballard.com/forum/topic.php?id=1869
  • Name
    you're an idiot. DO NOT presume you know ANYTHING about what goes on behind the walls of the churches where the SHARE folk reside. they had NO IDEA that he was a sex offender and once they found out, he was swiftly kicked to the curb. it's morons like you that continue to make it hard for us.
  • SorryButNo
    SHARE has a long history of refusing to run felony and sex offender checks. Had you run one of these first, you would have had an idea that he was a sex offender.

    I have no problem, BTW, with providing shelter space for these individuals in general. It just needs to be in locations without children present (like churches).
  • vanderleuns' mom
    vanderleun - Only if lightning hits your home and fries you!
  • vanderleun
    "We will continue our protest until our transportation crisis is over. "

    Is it too much to ask the gods of the weather for a torrential downpour with a side of hail?
  • Name
    suck a dick you punk ass piece of shit
  • SorryButNo
    watch your language.
blog comments powered by Disqus


More News from North Seattle